Skip to Accessibility Tools Skip to Content Skip to Footer
DNA with map pins showing distinct areas of the DNA

Biomarker Testing Needs to Keep Up With Treatments

There have been a lot of changes in lung cancer since I was diagnosed 5 1/2 years ago. When I had biomarker testing on my biopsy tissue in 2013, EGFR, ALK, and KRAS were the only mutations checked. And this was at a major academic medical center in Chicago! These three mutations were the only ones considered significant at the time.

Since then, the FDA has approved targeted therapy medications for ROS1, BRAF, and NTRK lung cancers, as well as additional, improved medications for EGFR and ALK patients. There are also many targeted therapy trials going on for those with other lung cancer mutations such as MET, RET and KRAS G12C.

Did you receive biomarker testing?

Immunotherapy was pretty much still in the realm of science fiction in lung cancer in 2013, but now it is used as a first line of treatment for many lung cancer patients and as part of combination therapy with chemotherapy for other patients. You can find hundreds of immunotherapy trials just for lung cancer alone if you look on clinicaltrials.gov.

Unfortunately, not all lung cancer patients who should benefit from these advances are benefiting in actuality. Depending on where they are diagnosed, many patients don’t even receive biomarker testing of their lung cancer, let alone a next generation sequencing (NGS) test that looks at a comprehensive mutation panel. Often, newly diagnosed patients are put directly on chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy because they are judged as unlikely to have a mutation based on their age, smoking history, and other factors.

Why people aren’t being tested for mutations

Why does this happen? Well, there are a number of possible reasons. Frequently, people are diagnosed by a general medical oncologist who sees patients with all kinds of cancer as opposed to a thoracic oncologist specializing in lung cancer. Given all the new developments and treatments in lung cancer in just the past 5 years, it is incredibly difficult for oncologists who don’t specialize in lung cancer to stay up-to-date on all treatment options. In addition, these oncologists often face pressure from their hospitals (and sometimes patients or families themselves) to get treatment started as soon as possible after diagnosis.

We need to advocate for biomarker testing

How do we fix this? We need to advocate for reflex biomarker testing for all lung cancer patients. In order to do this, the public needs to understand how critically important it is to have this testing to ensure the best available treatment when diagnosed with lung cancer.

Recently, AstraZeneca launched a campaign called “Test It Back” for biomarker testing with golf pro Jason Day, whose mother is living with EGFR positive lung cancer. This campaign focuses on the three most important steps needed for a correct lung cancer diagnosis and treatment — (1) TEST for common biomarkers, (2) KNOW the results, which requires waiting until all test results have been returned in order to make a treatment decision, and (3) TREAT based on what the tests reveal.

This campaign acknowledges that even when newly diagnosed patients get biomarker testing, they are frequently put on treatments before all test results have been returned. PDL1 level test results for immunotherapy often become available prior to test results for mutations such as EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and other oncogenes. This is especially dangerous because even a short time on the incorrect treatment can increase toxicity and side effects for patients if and when they are later discovered to have a targetable mutation and switched to a targeted therapy treatment.

Let’s make biomarker testing universal

Until everyone associates TEST, KNOW and TREAT with lung cancer, biomarker testing will not be universally adopted. You can read more about AstraZeneca’s testing campaign on the Test It Back website. We need more campaigns like this in order to make biomarker testing the norm for all lung cancer patients everywhere.

This article represents the opinions, thoughts, and experiences of the author; none of this content has been paid for by any advertiser. The LungCancer.net team does not recommend or endorse any products or treatments discussed herein. Learn more about how we maintain editorial integrity here.

Comments

  • edydede
    4 months ago

    I’m with you, however this is for NSCLC. Everything is for that type of Cancer, but not the kind I have, which is SCCLC. What about us? We have Cancer too!

  • Denise Cutlip moderator
    4 months ago

    Information is the fuel that research runs on. Please share your information with the lung cancer registry. https://www.lungcancerregistry.org/

  • Poll